Distributing Ghostscript embedded within hardware. For electronic form, it is both necessary and sufficient to put the GNU Ghostscript code and documentation in their own directory tree s. GPL Ghostscript, as delivered with the application, is usable independently of the application.
More precisely, if a user deletes from the computer system all files delivered with the application except those in the GPL Ghostscript directories, the user will still be able to use GPL Ghostscript as described in GPL Ghostscript's documentation. Among other things, this requires that GPL Ghostscript not call any routines in the application, and not require any data or other files supplied as part of the application.
Typically this requires use of a shell script or batch file, or a system call like " exec ". More precisely, if the user deletes from the computer system all the files in the GPL Ghostscript directories, and replaces the GPL Ghostscript executable with another program with the same name and conforming to the same documentation, the application will continue to work with it. It does not represent legal advice. If you are trying to determine whether to use Ghostscript software under AGPL or our alternative Artifex commercial license, please consider the following guidelines.
Distribution — Unlike most other open source licenses, AGPL's conditions are not all dependent on re-distribution of the software. For most other open source licenses like GPL , the condition for making source code available is the distribution of the software. Distribution means making a copy available or delivering a copy to someone outside your organization. So, for example, providing the software to an employee within your organization is not distribution, but providing the software to an outside consultant, beta tester, or customer is distribution.
If you are redistributing our software in binary form, you must make the source code available. AGPL also requires this. For example, if you are using the software on your own company's equipment, but you are making the functionality of the software available to users interacting with it remotely through a computer network, and you make any change to the software, you must make the source code for your changed version available to users of the software.
For a complete list of GNU packages and more, visit gnu. These GNU packages are looking for a maintainer. Check the list of decommissioned GNU packages if you have time and interest in resurrecting one. Also, Womb is a collective repository for random code that isn't ready to become a separate GNU project, or intends to be merged with an already existing GNU project. All pages marked with the Is GNU switch are shown here. Please report any anomaly immediately.
The copyright and license notices on this page only apply to the text on this page. Any software or copyright-licenses or other similar notices described in this text has its own copyright notice and license, which can usually be found in the distribution or license text itself. The FSF is a charity with a worldwide mission to advance software freedom — learn about our history and work. Privacy Policy.
JavaScript license information. But the GPL is designed, so you can use the program for whatever purpose you want. However, if you give somebody a modified version of the program itself, you must give the full source including all changes to who gets the program. As long as you use the original or keep any changes to yourself, you are in the clear.
But, check the ghostscript site , the license isn't just the plain GPL anymore. The "link with a library" is a grey area, no court has defined if that creates a derivative work AFAIK. You should ask the owners of the code, perhaps even ask for special permission or make sure you just use the program unchanged, as designed.
Note that Ghostscript is a Postscript interpreter, I don't know if its output contains other stuff such as fonts , would need to check that.
Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Collectives on Stack Overflow.
0コメント